Legal Opinion

Rankin v. Kirsch

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 14, 2025No. 1:24-cv-00352Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION PRINCE RANKIN and NAJAH ABDEL : AZIZ, : : Case No. 1:24-cv-352 Plaintiffs, : : Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins v. : : GARY M. KIRSH, M.D. and TRI- : STATE UROLOGIC SERVICES, P.S.C., : INC., Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings of Defendants Gary M. Kirsh, M.D. and Tri-State Urologic Services, P.S.C., Inc. Doc. 9. Because Plaintiffs’ challenge to Ohio courts’ application of Ohio’s medical statute of repose is barred from being reviewed in federal court by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Denise Coley v. Lucas County, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  5. Kovacic v. Cuyahoga County Dep't of Children & Family ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API