Legal Opinion
Wells v. Cunningham
Lakewood Municipal Court
Decided July 24, 1990No. 90 CVG 609PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPatrick Carroll, J.
The plaintiff, Hazel J. Wells, commenced this action for forcible entry and detainer against the defendant, Richard Cunningham. A hearing was held on the issue of the plaintiff’s claim for relief. The plaintiff was the sole witness at the hearing. The remainder of the evidence in this case was submitted to the court by stipulations of the parties. The evidence in the record shows that the material facts in this case are not in dispute.
This case arises out of an attempt by the plaintiff to transfer the real property located at 1590 Elbur Avenue, Lakewood, Ohio (the “Elbur property”), to her…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Seventh Urban, Inc. v. University Circle Property Development, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
- Behrle v. BeamOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State ex rel. National Employee Benefit Services, Inc. v. Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Carpenter v. Warren Municipal CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Lin v. ReidOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Cleveland v. A.J. Rose Manufacturing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. Comstock, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
- Eaker v. CunninghamOhio Court of Appeals · 2026