Legal Opinion

The Edna V. Crew

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided October 20, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Admiralty. Suit for collision by The New York, Philadelphia & Norfolk Railroad Company, as owner of Barge No. 2, against the steam tug Edna V. Crew and schooner Baker Palmer, and cross-libel-by Edward H. Smeed, master of the Palmer, against the steam tug Portsmouth and Barge No. 2. Decree against the Edna V. Crew.

1Opinion of the Court

WABDILL, District Judge.

On the evening of June 21, 1909; about 8:30 o’clock, Barge No. 2, a car float of the New York, Phila-* delphia & Norfolk Railroad Company in tow of the railroad company’s tug Portsmouth, en route from Cape Charles to Norfolk, Va., came into collision with the schooner Baker Palmer, then in tow of the tug Edna V. Crew, owned by Joseph M. Clark Company. The collision occurred in the waters of Chesapeake Bay, just outside of Hampton Roads, about three-quarters of a mile below the Ripraps, off Old-Point Comfort, Va.

The tug Portsmouth was a seagoing' tug especially equipped…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The " Galatea."Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Lake Erie Transp. Co. v. Gilchrist Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  3. Merchants' & Miners' Transp. Co. v. Norfolk & W. R.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1896
  4. The Lowell M. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
  5. McClellan v. Volunteer & SyracuseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. The GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  2. The Edna V. CrewCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1913
  3. P. Dougherty Co. v. The BaltimoreDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API