Legal Opinion

Mooney v. Tuckerman

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 15, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarrows, J.

Prior to 1922 an act of the General Assembly existed relative to motor vehicles and their operation on the highways of this State. This act, as modified, in General Laws 1923, Chapter 98, comprehensively defined motor vehicles and required their registration by the State Board of Public Roads. In 1921 respondent was the operator of a garage and owner of a Reo truck and bus. He had complied with all registration requirements ¡of existing law and continued after 1923 to comply with Chapter 98. He made a contract with certain men who worked at the Bradford Mill in Westerly by which he agreed to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Terminal Taxicab Co. v. KutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Cushing v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. State Ex Rel. Public Utilities Commission v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  2. Weaver v. Public Service CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
  3. East St. Louis Light & Power Co. v. Swift & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API