Legal Opinion

The May McGuirl

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 29, 1914Published

In Admiralty. Suit by the Lehigh Valley Transportation Company against the steam tug May McGuirl.

1Opinion of the Court

CHATFIELD, District Judge.

At the trial of this case upon March 13, 1914, at the close of the testimony, the following findings of fact were stated, with a reservation of determination as to the proximate cause of the accident and the legal responsibility therefor:

“The tug having gone to Fifty-Second street with the barge Fort Hamilton alongside, and failing to get another barge at that point, took the Fort Hamilton in tow with two hawsers of 20 fathoms each to proceed to the North River. The wind had been strong enough before leaving Fifty-Second street to put upon the captain the obligation…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Insurance Co. v. BoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Scheffer v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Insurance Co. v. TweedSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. The G. R. BoothSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API