People v. Juntikka
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGadola, J.
At issue in this case is whether a trial court properly imposed a $100 probation enhancement fee on defendant under MCL 771.3. Because we conclude that MCL 771.3(2)(d) does not independently authorize trial courts to impose any assessment, and because we conclude that the probation enhancement fee was not statutorily authorized as a cost specifically incurred in defendant’s case, we vacate the portion of the court’s order imposing the probation enhancement fee and remand for further proceedings.
I. BACKGROUND
On January 23, 2013, defendant pleaded guilty to one count of failing to register as a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Koontz v. Ameritech Services, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Old Republic InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. AkinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. CunninghamMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. EarlMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People of Michigan v. Anthony Gayl LakeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
- People of Michigan v. Deandre MathisMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- People of Michigan v. Deandre MathisMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- People of Michigan v. Lois Butler-JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
- People of Michigan v. Sonya Javah MooreMichigan Court of Appeals · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.