Legal Opinion
Black v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided November 6, 2002PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHerschel Pickens Franks, J.
in which CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., J., and D. MICHAEL SWINEY, J., joined.
OPINION
In action for breach of insurance contract, the Trial Court granted Summary Judgment on the ground insurance company had properly satisfied all claims under plaintiffs’ policies. Plaintiffs have appealed. We affirm.
In this action for breach of contract, the Trial Court granted defendant summary judgment and plaintiffs have appealed.
Plaintiffs had policies of insurance with defendant and were involved in automobile accidents which resulted in damage to their insured vehicles. Defendant, in adjusting the claims…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Manguno v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Chester-O'Donley & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- Randy v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2001
- Siegle v. Progressive Consumers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2002
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MabrySupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Culhane v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Southeast Mental Health Center, Inc. v. Pacific InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2006
- Allgood v. Meridian Security Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Gonzales v. FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGONCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Allgood v. Meridian Security Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.