Legal Opinion
Ordon v. Karpie
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 9, 2006No. Civ. 3:01cv1951(AHN)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
ALAN H. NEVAS, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Andrew Ordon, M.D. (“Dr. Ordon”), brought this action against his former attorney, Karen Karpie (“Karpie”), and the law firm in which she is a partner, Murphy & Karpie (collectively “the Defendants”), alleging that Karpie negligently failed to inform him that if he settled a complaint against him before the Connecticut Medical Examining Board (“CMEB”), he might still be subject to reciprocal discipline by the medical boards of other jurisdictions. On March 31, 2006, the court granted the Defendants’ motion for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- LoSacco v. City of MiddletownDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1993
- Kranis v. ScottDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Victor G. Reiling Associates & Design Innovation, Inc. v. Fisher-Price, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
- Ordon v. KarpieDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
3Cited by2 opinions
- Demetres v. Zillow, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
- Phoenix Restoration Group, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Group Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2020