Legal Opinion
Elesha Soto v. Social Security Disability, et al.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 3, 2026No. 3:25-cv-11066Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ELESHA SOTO, Case No. 25-cv-11066-LJC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICAITON TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 9 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 10 SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY, et al., COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED Defendants. 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 1, 2 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION AND IFP APPLICATION 14 Plaintiff Elesha Soto, pro se, applies to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). ECF No. 2. 15 Sufficient cause having been shown, that application is GRANTED. 16 The Court now considers the sufficiency of Soto’s Complaint under 28 U.S.C. 17…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Mark Munoz v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.