Legal Opinion

Parents, Families, & Friends of Lesbians & Gays, Inc. v. Camdenton R-III School District

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided February 15, 2012No. Case No. 2:11-CV-04212PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NANETTE K. LAUGHREY, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Parents, Families, and Friends of Lesbians and Gays’s (“PFLAG”), and others’, Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Doc. # 6] pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a). PFLAG claims that Defendant Camdenton School District, and others, implemented internet filtering software that systematically blocks websites expressing a positive viewpoint toward lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (“LGBT”) individuals, in violation of PFLAG’s freedom of expression under the First Amendment. The Court held a hearing on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. NDN Collective, Sunny Red Bear, Nick Cottier, Bre Jackson, Mary Bowman and George Bettelyoun v. Retsel Corporation, d/b/a Grand Gateway Hotel and d/b/a Cheers Sports Lounge and CasinoDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API