Legal Opinion

Blacklight Power, Inc. v. Dickinson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 15, 2000No. Civil Action 00-422(EGS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SULLIVAN, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Plaintiff Blacklight Power, Inc., alleges that defendant Q. Todd Dickinson, Commissioner of the Patent and Office (PTO), violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. § 706 et seq., when the PTO withdrew one and threatened to withdraw four others of plaintiffs patents from issue after plaintiff had received a “Notice of Allowance and Issue Fee Due” and payed the issue fee. The issues presented are whether the defendant had the authority to withdraw plaintiffs patent after plaintiff had paid the issue fee, and, if…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Franklin v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blacklight Power, Inc. v. James E. Rogan, Director, Patent and Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API