Legal Opinion

State v. Pilago

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1982No. 7764PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LUM, J.

Appellant Bryan B. Pilago was convicted under a multiple-count indictment for offenses under the Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS), namely, (Count I) possession of a prohibited firearm, section 134-8, (Count III) receiving, retaining or disposing of stolen property (firearm), section 708-831(l)(c) and (Count V), possession of firearm by a person convicted of certain crimes, section 134-7(b).

The most critical issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in failing to suppress certain taped conversations between the police *23and appellant. It is appellant’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. RodriguesHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. LesterHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. PiaHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. DiasHawaii Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. RabagoHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. HoopiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. OkuboHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. State v. FreemanHawaii Supreme Court · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API