Legal Opinion
State v. Okubo
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Decided October 19, 1982No. 8286PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
BURNS, C.J.
Defendants-Appellees Roy Okubo and George Yamamoto (defendants) were indicted respectively for 7 and 19 counts of bribery in violation of § 7l0-1040(l)(a) of the Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) (1976). The defendants were accused of paying two Honolulu police officers for information of impending police raids on an alleged massage parlor establishment. During the pretrial proceedings, the lower court judge partially granted defendants’ motion to suppress *397evidence brought under Rule 12(b), Hawaii Rules of Penal Procedure (1977) (HRPP). The evidence suppressed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Zimmerman v. Bishop EstateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- State v. OkuboHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. OrtizHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. AugafaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. LeeHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.