Legal Opinion

People v. Mitchell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 1, 2009PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*785Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004], cert denied 542 US 946 [2004]; People v…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. MullingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. BanksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. People v. PocestaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. People v. SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. People v. PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API