Legal Opinion

Moody v. Royal Wolf Lodge

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 2014No. 6966 S-14864/S-14883PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOLGER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A pilot who worked at a remote fishing lodge filed a claim under the Alaska Wage and Hour Act (AWHA) for unpaid overtime wages. Applying the four-part test of Dayhoff v. Temsco Helicopters, Inc., 1 the superi- or court concluded that the pilot was a "professional employee" who was exempt from the overtime requirement. But the legislature amended AWHA in 2005 to adopt the federal definition of this exemption. 2 The federal definition restricts the exemption to employees in "professions where specialized academic training is a standard prerequisite." 3…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Pignataro v. Port Auth. of New York and New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  3. D.M. v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. A.M. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Pippins v. KPMG LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. Grinnell Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  2. Regina C. v. Michael C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Botson v. Municipality of AnchoragesAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Easley v. EasleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Alisa Burns v. John Everett BurnsAlaska Supreme Court · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API