Moody v. Royal Wolf Lodge
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOLGER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
A pilot who worked at a remote fishing lodge filed a claim under the Alaska Wage and Hour Act (AWHA) for unpaid overtime wages. Applying the four-part test of Dayhoff v. Temsco Helicopters, Inc., 1 the superi- or court concluded that the pilot was a "professional employee" who was exempt from the overtime requirement. But the legislature amended AWHA in 2005 to adopt the federal definition of this exemption. 2 The federal definition restricts the exemption to employees in "professions where specialized academic training is a standard prerequisite." 3…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pignataro v. Port Auth. of New York and New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- D.M. v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- A.M. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Pippins v. KPMG LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hawkins v. Grinnell Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- Regina C. v. Michael C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Botson v. Municipality of AnchoragesAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Easley v. EasleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
- Alisa Burns v. John Everett BurnsAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.