Legal Opinion
Kelly v. Phiten USA, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided October 28, 2011No. 4:11-cv-00067-JEG-CFBPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES E. GRITZNER, District Judge.
Now before the Court is a Motion to Certify Class, a Motion for Final Approval of Settlement, and an Unopposed Motion for Approval of Attorneys’ Fees, Service Awards, and Reimbursement of Expenses filed by Plaintiff Sean Kelly (Kelly) on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated. Defendant Phiten USA, Inc. (Phiten or Defendant), has not resisted these motions. Both parties were represented by counsel at the Final Hearing1 held on October 13, 2011. The matter is now ready for final ruling.
I. BACKGROUND
On February 14, 2011, Kelly filed a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- In Re Wireless Telephone Federal Cost Recovery Fees LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- William ALPERN and Russell D. Miller, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. UTILICORP UNITED, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Petrovic v. Amoco Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Montoya v. CRST Expedited, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- In re Pool Products Distribution Market Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2015
- Morgan v. Pub. StorageDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
- Montoya v. CRST Expedited, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018