Peridot Tree, Inc. v. City of Sacramento
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Peridot Tree, Inc., et al., No. 2:22-cv-00289-KJM-DB 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER 13 v. 14 City of Sacramento, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 The plaintiffs in this action, Peridot Tree, Inc. and Kenneth Gay, claim the City of 18 | Sacramento has wrongly discriminated against interstate commerce in marijuana contrary to the 19 | “dormant” aspect of the Constitution’s Commerce Clause. Congress, however, has outlawed 20 | marijuana distribution. Although that prohibition does not deprive this court of…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.