Legal Opinion
Durant v. Neneman
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 11, 1989No. Nos. 88-1615, 88-1617PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Sandra Durant and James E. Tassin appeal from an order dismissing their complaints for damages. Ms. Durant, widow of Charles N. Durant, and Mr. Tas-sin claimed the negligence of defendant James Neneman caused the death of Mr. Durant and injuries to Mr. Tassin. Plaintiffs filed a civil action in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, asserting diversity jurisdiction.1 Albeit reluctantly, the court dismissed the complaints believing the result was compelled by Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135, 71 S.Ct. 153, 95 L.Ed. 152 (1950).…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. ShearerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Marsha L. Lutz v. Secretary of the Air Force, and Gerald L. Ivory, Manuel E. Ferdin, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Overton v. New York State Division Of Military And Naval AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- McMahon Ex Rel. Estate of McMahon v. Presidential Airways, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2006
- Saum v. WidnallDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1996
- Colon v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2018
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.