Legal Opinion

Senter v. Dixie Motor Coach Corp.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1936No. 6722PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Judge HARVEY

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

This is an action instituted by E. G. Senter, Jr., against the Dixie Motor Coach Corporation, for the recovery of damages alleged to have resulted from an anticipatory breach of a certain lease contract. The case was tried before 'a jury, but at the conclusion of the testimony the trial court peremptorily instructed a verdict for the corporation, and judgment was entered accordingly. The jujdgment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 67 S. W. (2d) 345.

The record discloses that the following facts…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Senter v. Dixie Motor Coach Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cowden v. Broderick & Calvert, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Tractebel Energy Marketing, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  3. Alexander Co. v. First Nat. Bank of LagrangeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Laird v. Dixie Motor Coach Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Alexander Co. v. First Nat. Bank of LagrangeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API