Legal Opinion
Blue Barn Associates v. Picnic 'N Chicken, Inc. (In Re Picnic 'N Chicken, Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California
Decided March 17, 1986No. 09-17491PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
LOUISE DECARL MÁLUGEN, Bankruptcy Judge.
Picnic ‘N Chicken, Inc., the debtor and defendant in the complaint by Blue Bam Associates to impress an equitable lien, has moved this Court for summary judgment, contending there is no genuine issue of material fact remaining to be determined, and that the defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Plaintiff has made a cross-motion for summary judgment.
FACTUAL SUMMARY
The facts in this action are not in dispute. At the inception of its reorganization case, Picnic ‘N Chicken, Inc. (“Picnic”)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In the Matter of Barbara Garfinkle, Bankrupt. Commercial Trading Company, Inc., Kenneth J. Weil, Trustee in Bankruptcy v. Morris LansburghCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Commercial Finance, Ltd. v. Hawaii Dimensions, Inc. (In Re Hawaii Dimensions, Inc.)District Court, D. Hawaii · 1985
- Burke Investors v. Nite Lite Inns (In Re Nite Lite Inns)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1981
- California Safety Center, Inc. v. Jax Car Sales of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
3Cited by23 opinions
- In Re Jeffrey Rosenfeld, Debtor. River Place East Housing Corporation, Board of Directors v. Jeffrey RosenfeldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Societe Nationale Algerienne Pour La Recherche, La Production, Le Transport, La Transformation Et La Commercialisation Des Hydrocarbures v. Distrigas Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1987
- In Re McLean Enterprises, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1989
- Syufy Enterprises v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- In Re BergtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Alaska · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.