Legal Opinion

Charles Gilmore v. Ronald Marks, Commissioner and the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania, and the District Attorney of Philadelphia

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 17, 1986No. 85-1500PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

Before us is the appeal of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania from the district court’s decision to grant a writ of habeas corpus ordering the release of the appellee, Charles Gilmore. The issue presented is whether the Supreme Court’s decision in Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465, 96 S.Ct. 3037, 49 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1976), bars federal habeas corpus review of a state court’s determination that a violation of the habeas petitioner’s Fourth Amendment rights constituted harmless error.

I

The events underlying this appeal stretch back 13 years. In 1973, Ollie…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Marshall v. HendricksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  2. Andre Stanley Deputy v. Stanley Taylor, Warden, Sussex Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. Marshall v. HendricksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  4. Brown v. SirmonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  5. State v. HoeplingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API