Legal Opinion
Hallum v. Rovident Life & Accident Insurance
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided August 10, 2001No. 1:00-cv-01159PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PANNELL, District Judge.
The plaintiff filed the instant action, seeking a declaratory judgment for disability benefits under certain provisions of his insurance policy. The matter is presently before the court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment.
In analyzing a summary judgment motion, the court resolves all issues of fact in favor of the non-movant. See Cottrell v. Caldwell, 85 F.3d 1480 (11th Cir.1996). As both parties have filed a motion for summary judgment, the court states the facts of the case in the light most favorable to the party opposing the others’ motion.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Cottrell v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bilezikjian v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010