Legal Opinion

Funnell v. Conrad

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 10, 1918No. 9462PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District Court. Payne County: John P. Hickam. Judge. Ejectment by Mary Conrad against R. J. Funnell. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DAVIS, C.

This action was instituted in the district court of Payne county, Oltla., by Mary Conrad, defendant in error, against R. J. Funnell, plaintiff in error, to recover possession of lots 1, 2, 3, 4. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, in block 72. South addition to the town of Cushing, Payne county. Okla. It is an ordinary action in ejectment. Upon the issues being formed the cause was submitted to a jury, and a verdict returned in favor of the defendant in error, plaintiff below. The parties will be referred to as they appeaTed in the trial court: that is. plaintiff in error as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Crook v. First National Bank of BarabooWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Apache State Bank v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Checotah Hardware Co. v. HensleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Hopkins v. CothranSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  5. Nooner v. ShortSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Starr v. VaughnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Sauls v. WhitmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Gilbert v. Conservative Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API