Legal Opinion

Grant v. Cedar Falls Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 19, 1992No. 90-415PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARTER, Justice.

The issue that we must decide on this appeal is whether an amendment to plaintiffs’ petition, which corrected an error in the name of the corporate defendant being sued, relates back to the time the original petition was filed. The district court ruled that the amendment did not relate back and that the action was therefore barred by the statute of limitations. The court of appeals reversed the district court’s judgment, holding that the amendment did relate back. After reviewing the arguments presented, we agree with the district court and disagree with the court of appeals.

Pl…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Jacobson v. Union Story Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  3. Schellhorn v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  4. Bean v. Midwest Battery & Metal, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1989

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Porter v. Good EavespoutingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  2. Estate of Kuhns v. MarcoSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  3. Erickson v. Wright Welding Supply, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  4. Alvarez v. Meadow Lane Mall Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  5. Hawkeye Bank v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API