Legal Opinion
Ex parte Tayohichi Yamada
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided June 30, 1924No. 8623PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
The petitioner invokes the five years after entry limitation specified by section 19 of the act of 1917 (Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 4289J4jj)- The Immigration Act of 1924 took effect May 26, 1924, and has no application. The government contends that the conviction of the alien in 1907 in the United States subjected him to deportation under the act of 1917 at any time, and cites Lauria v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 271 Fed. 261; U. S. *249ex rel. David v. Tod (C. C. A.) 289 Fed. 60, and Hughes v. Tropello (C. C. A.) 296 Fed. 306.
Lauria first entered the United…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hughes v. TropelloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
- Lauria v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- United States ex rel. David v. TodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Rousseau v. WeedinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States ex rel. Shladzien v. Warden of Eastern State PenitentiaryDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1930
- Tillinghast v. Cresswell ex rel. Di PierroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1931
- Ex parte McMahonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1924
- United States ex rel. Pappageanakis v. ShaughnessyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Di Pierro v. TillinghastDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1930