Legal Opinion
Hughes v. Cordell
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided July 11, 1927PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
The facts of this case are correctly stated by counsel for the appellees as follows:
“On February 16, 1920, Oeorge Flannagan executed an oil and gas lease to R. Y. M. Cordell, describing therein lot 1 in the northeast quarter and lot 1 in the northwest quarter of section 6, township 16 south, range 15 west, containing 90.26 acres. In form, the lease is an ordinary oil and gas lease, containing only the usual provisions relating to the payment of royalty and the development of the land. There is no provision in the lease for a forfeiture for failure to develop. .
“The lease was afterward…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gypsy Oil Co. v. CoverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Cadillac Oil & Gas Co. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Cox v. Sinclair Gulf Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Wooten v. Farmers' & Merchants' BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Duke v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana v. GillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Drummond v. AlphinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Henry v. Gulf Refining Co. of LouisianaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- State Ex Rel. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. WordenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- Alphin v. Gulf Refining Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.