Legal Opinion

Harrington v. Propulsion Engine Corp.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 8, 1952No. 38,567PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This was an action to recover a broker’s commission under a written contract. Plaintiffs prevailed and defendants have appealed. Plaintiffs have cross-appealed from a ruling denying their recovery of the full amount which they sought to recover.

In their petition plaintiffs alleged their status as partners engaged in the sale of industrial properties and their post-office address in Chicago, 111.; that defendant Propulsion Engine Corporation, hereafter referred to as the Engine Corporation, was organized under the laws of Missouri and engaged…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fultz v. WimerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  2. Morrison v. Hawkeye Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  3. Toklan Royalty Corp. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  4. Hubert v. Board of Public UtilitiesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  5. Phenix Insurance Co. of Brooklyn v. WeeksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mingenback v. MingenbackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  2. Thomas v. JarvisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. Spencer v. SupernoisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  4. Weniger v. Union Center Plaza AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  5. In Re Estate of JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API