Byford v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANNHEIMER, Judge.
A jury found Edward Gaylord Byford Jr. guilty of three offenses: scheme to defraud, first-degree theft (by deception), and deceptive business practices. 1 The superior court merged these three verdicts into one conviction (for scheme to defraud), and the court then sentenced Byford to 6 years' imprisonment with 3 years suspended.
In this appeal, Byford argues that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict on the charge of deceptive business practices. Byford also challenges the jury's verdict on the scheme to defraud charge. The statute defining…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McClain v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- United States v. Jerry R. Mastelotto, and Willis B. InglesbyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- State v. JamesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Totemoff v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Ward v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2016
- Byford v. McCloudDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2020