Legal Opinion

Antonopoulas v. Black

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 20, 1920No. 11898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Application for mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. Where one convicted of a capital felony has filed a certified bill of exceptions to the judgment overruling his motion for a now trial, the granting of a supersedeas is a matter of course, and can be enforced by mandamus. Spann v. Clark, 47 Ga. 369; Malone v. Hopkins, 49 Ga. 221. Where, however, there is a conviction of a lesser offense, the filing of such a bill of exceptions does not operate as a supersedeas and the judge is not required to order a supersedeas until the defendant has given bond in a sum fixed by the judge or has filed an affidavit in forma pauperis. Penal Code (1910), §…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Malone v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
  2. Fountain v. CrumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  3. Spann v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Antonopoulas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  2. McLendon v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API