Antonopoulas v. Black
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Application for mandamus.
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
1. Where one convicted of a capital felony has filed a certified bill of exceptions to the judgment overruling his motion for a now trial, the granting of a supersedeas is a matter of course, and can be enforced by mandamus. Spann v. Clark, 47 Ga. 369; Malone v. Hopkins, 49 Ga. 221. Where, however, there is a conviction of a lesser offense, the filing of such a bill of exceptions does not operate as a supersedeas and the judge is not required to order a supersedeas until the defendant has given bond in a sum fixed by the judge or has filed an affidavit in forma pauperis. Penal Code (1910), §…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Malone v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
- Fountain v. CrumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Spann v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
3Cited by2 opinions
- Antonopoulas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- McLendon v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950