Wallsten v. International Bank of Commerce
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KAZEN, District Judge.
Pending are five motions for partial summary judgment by Defendant International Bank of Commerce (IBC). Background facts were previously reviewed in this Court’s opinion of October 23, 1990. 770 F.Supp. 1161. The five motions are resolved as follows:
Payment—Wallsten. IBC asserts that Plaintiff Sven Wallsten made alternative arrangements with Horst Von Soden for the partial payment of the $250,000 check (check # 712) which was lost before it was deposited to Wallsten’s account at IBC. IBC notes that Von Soden transferred $100,000 to Wallsten’s account…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ramos v. Frito-Lay, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. HagenlohTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- First National Bank of Beeville v. FojtikTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Houston Transit Co. v. FelderTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- Kendall v. Whataburger, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Saucier v. Coldwell Banker JME RealtyDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2007