CRG Network v. Barland
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
RUDOLPH T- RANDA, District Judge.
The plaintiff, CRG Network, is an organization whose mission is to help citizens elect fiscally conservative candidates, assert property rights, and remove corrupt and/or fiscally irresponsible politicians from office. CRG is a “committee” as that term is defined in Wisconsin’s campaign finance law. Wis. Stat. § 11.01(4).
In the upcoming general election, CRG believes that Dan Knodl, Robyn Vos, John Nygren and Dale Kooyenga are excellent candidates for the Wisconsin Assembly because they share the same fundamental beliefs as CRG with respect…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Cyril Korte v. HHSCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- McCutcheon v. Federal Election Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- American Civil Liberties Union of Ill. v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- CRG Network v. BarlandDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2015
- Francis D. Schmitz v. Honorable Gregory A. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- State Ex Rel. Two Unnamed v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- State Ex Rel. Two Unnamed v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- Three Unnamed v. Gregory A. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015