Legal Opinion

Mason & Dixon Lines Inc. v. Odom

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 13, 1942No. 13916, 13942PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keid, Chief Justice.

The first question presented for decision is whether the defendants forfeited their conceded right to picket the plaintiff, by acts of violence committed in connection with the strike. Counsel for the plaintiff' cites and relies on Milk Wagon Drivers Union of Chicago v. Meadowmoor Dairies Inc., 312 U. S. 287 (61 Sup. Ct. 553, 85 L. ed. 836). In that case the Supreme Court held that all picketing might be enjoined where it was entangled with acts of violence of such character and extent that “it could justifiably be concluded that the momentum of fear generated by past…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Milk Wagon Drivers Union, Local 753 v. Meadowmoor Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. American Steel Foundries v. Tri-City Central Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. American Federation of Labor v. SwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Senn v. Tile Layers Protective UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HenryTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Parham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  3. Crumb v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  4. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local No. 393 v. Missouri Pac. Freight Transport Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  5. Traylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API