Legal Opinion

Crumb v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 12, 1949No. 16710PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The Code, § 59-106, 'makes provision for the selection of jurors. In substance it provides that the jury commissioners shall select from the books of the tax receiver “upright and intelligent” men to serve as jurors, and then select from these, not exceeding two-fifths, the most “experienced, intelligent, and upright” to serve as grand jurors.

The accused asserts that over a long period of time Negroes have been purposely and expressly excluded from the jury list solely on account of their race, and that by such systematic and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Norris v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Neal v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Hill v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Patton v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Pierre v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Avery v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Woodside v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  3. Ex Rel. Preston Cobb, Jr. v. R. P. Balkcom, Jr., WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  4. Avery v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  5. Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API