Legal Opinion

Aucoin v. the Prudential Insurance Company of America

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 14, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2013-0321PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge.

This suit involves a claim for disability benefits pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Compl. [Dkt. #1] ¶ 1. Plaintiff Monique Aucoin sues the D.R. Horton Long Term Disability Plan (the “Plan”), the benefit plan sponsored and administered by her former employer D.R. Horton Corp., and the Plan’s claims administrator, Prudential Insurance Company of America, for denying her claim for disability benefits. See Compl. ¶ 4. Prudential moves to transfer the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) to…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Republic of Panama v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg) S.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  4. Board of Trustees, Sheet Metal Workers National Fund v. Baylor Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988
  5. In Re KOREAN AIR LINES DISASTER OF SEPTEMBER 1, 1983. Appeal of Plaintiffs Steering CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. Suntrust Banks, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Keister v. Aarp Benefits CommitteeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
  3. Melichar v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kan., Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API