Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Cty Richmond, KY

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 28, 2004No. 03-6336PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge.

Gregory Tucker filed claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Richmond, Kentucky, and against the following City officials and employees: Mayor Ann Durham, Police Chief Charles DeBord, Assistant Police Chief Kenneth Caldwell and Police Officer Sam Manley. (Although there is some discrepancy in the briefs and the joint appendix regarding the correct spelling of Chief DeBord’s name, we have adopted the spelling used in the defendants’ appellate brief.) Tucker alleged that the individual defendants unconstitutionally retaliated against…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Bogan v. Scott-HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Earnest Bell, Jr. v. Robert Johnson, Mark Stimpson Allen BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Michele Rafferty v. Trumbull Cty., OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. Chesher v. NeyerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Thurman King v. City of Rockford, MICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
  4. Baker v. FieldsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Tucker v. City Of RichmondCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API