Legal Opinion · Dissent

Marian Brockamp, Administrator and Sole Residuary Beneficiary of the Estate of Stanley B. McGill Deceased v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 5, 1995No. 94-56424Published

1DissentFernandez, Circuit Judge

Under 26 U.S.C. § 6511(a), Brockamp’s claim for a refund of her father’s 1983 taxes was untimely. See Miller v. United States, 38 F.3d 473, 475 (9th Cir.1994). Brockamp argues that even so the doctrine of equitable tolling should operate to relieve her from the time limitations of § 6511.1

The Supreme Court has held that “the same rebuttable presumption of equitable tolling applicable to suits against private defendants should also apply to suits against the United States.” Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs, 498 U.S. 89, 95-96, 111 S.Ct. 453, 457, 112 L.Ed.2d 435 (1990) (Title VII…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Parks School of Business, Inc., Dba Parks College, a New Mexico Corporation v. Fife Symington Roy A. Nicholson Sally HeinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API