Legal Opinion

State v. . Herndon

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 19, 1943PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNy, J.

The defendant does not contend that the evidence adduced at the trial was insufficient to show that the premises were used for the purpose of prostitution and assignation. The buildings are located across the hard-surface road from the residence occupied by the defendant and his wife, Edith Herndon, and consists of one central building, known as Herndon’s Service Station, and seven cabins.

The evidence disclosed that Charlie Herndon did operate the service station and cabins several months prior to the date in question, 14 June, 1942. Later the cabins were being operated by Mrs. Herndon and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Graeter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. State v. . MerrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. State v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. State v. . HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. State v. . LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  2. State v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. State v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. State v. . GordonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API