Legal Opinion

People v. Reardon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 23, 1987PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s second trial was not barred by the double jeopardy clauses of either the Federal (US Const 5th Amend) or State Constitutions (NY Const, art I, § 6). Where the defendant either requests a mistrial or consents to its declaration, the double jeopardy clauses do not ordinarily bar a second trial (People v Ferguson, 67 NY2d 383, 388; see, e.g, United States v Scott, 437 US 82, 93). There is no dispute that defendant requested the mistrial during the first trial. We find no support for defendant’s claim that the mistrial motion was necessitated…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. People v. FergusonNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. RobertsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. People v. PresleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. People v. ParillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  4. People v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API