Legal Opinion

Providence Washington Insurance Co. of Alaska v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Companies

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1989No. S-2335PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Arctic Coast Fisheries (ACF) obtained a judgment against the City of Valdez (City), for which the City’s insurers were liable. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Companies (Fireman’s Fund), one of the City’s excess insurance carriers, negotiated a settlement with the City for an amount less than the original judgment. All of the City’s insurance carriers contributed to the settlement. Fireman’s Fund then sued Providence Washington Insurance Company of Alaska (Providence Washington), claiming Providence Washington was liable for post-judgment interest under the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. O'Neill Investigations, Inc. v. Illinois Employers Insurance of WausauAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Werley v. United Services Automobile AssociationAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Howarth v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Bembridge v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Bohna v. HUGHES, THORSNESS, GANTZAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. HarringtonAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Tucker v. United Services Automobile Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. O'DONNELL v. JohnsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API