Legal Opinion
Snelling v. Chrysler Motors Corp.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 22, 1993No. 63043PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff, Lonnie D. Snelling, appeals the trial court’s order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss and to enforce settlement. We dismiss the appeal for failure to comply with Rule 84.04 and assess damages for filing a frivolous appeal pursuant to Rule 84.19.
Plaintiff filed a three-count action against Chrysler Motors Corporation, Lou Fusz Dodge Company and King Dodge, Inc. Plaintiff alleged that a vehicle he purchased from Lou Fusz Dodge, manufactured by Chrysler and serviced by King Dodge, was defective and the warranty was not honored. On June 12, 1992, defendants filed a motion to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Krasney v. Curators of the University of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Chism v. SteffensMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Jensen v. JensenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Lebedun v. RobinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Matter of Estate of VoegeleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Luft v. SchoenhoffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Carden v. Missouri Intergovernmental Risk Management Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Shiyr v. PinckneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Jones v. WolffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Faith Baptist Church of Berkeley, Inc. v. HeffnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.