Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Edenfield

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided June 12, 1997No. 96-2672-CIV-T-17EPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KOVACHEVICH, District Judge.

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’, MICHAEL S. EDENFIELD AND BATTLE & EDENFIELD, P.A., MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED COMPLAINT

This cause is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt.18) and Plaintiffs’ response (Dkt.24).

STANDARD OF REVIEW

Under Conley v. Gibson, a district court should not dismiss a complaint “for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond a doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts” that would entitle the plaintiff to relief. 355 U.S. 41, 45, 78 S.Ct. 99, 101-02, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957); see also Bracewell v. Nicholson Air…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Rickman v. Precisionaire, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1995
  4. Executive 100, Inc. v. Martin CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  5. Blumel v. MylanderDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Metcalf v. Beverly Health & Rehabilitation Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API