Legal Opinion

Hams v. Marshall

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 14, 1930No. 388PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

The facts are not disputed. On January 20, 1926, Matthew M. Marshall and John J. Hams executed in New York City their promissory note to Frank M. Dunbaugh for borrowed money. Under an agreement of even date they deposited with Dunbaugh as security for their note certificates for certain shares of stock and title deeds running to Marshall, as grantee, of land located in Texas and in Florida. Subsequently, an extension *704agreement, dated July 21, 1926, was entered into, extending payment of the note and conferring more detailed powers of sale upon Dunbaugh in ease of default…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Walker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Fairbanks Steam Shovel Company v. Wills, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Federal Contracting CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Paris Grocer Co. v. W.H. BurksTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Hutchinson v. StoneSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  5. Carr v. ThomasSupreme Court of Florida · 1882

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States of America and Ellis Campbell, Jr. v. Creamer Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  2. Sammet v. MayerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  3. United States of America and Ellis Campbell, Jr. v. Creamer Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API