Legal Opinion
Sammet v. Mayer
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 18, 1939No. 86PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
The bankrupts were the sole partners in a brokerage firm known as Wyser & Diner. On October 27, 1937, they borrowed $4,000 from Kurt F. Mayer, the claimant-appellee herein, and gave him their promissory note wherein it was recited that certain specified stocks wer.e collateral security for the note. Mayer was about to depart, and in a short time did depart, on a protracted trip to the Orient. The stock certificates were not placed in the hands of the claimant, but were immediately segregated by the bankrupts and put in an envelope, on the outside of which was written the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Williams v. . IngersollNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- National City Bank of NY v. HotchkissSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Benedict v. RatnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Sexton v. Kessler & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Casey v. CavarocSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gins v. Mauser Plumbing Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Clarkson Co. Ltd. v. ShaheenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Sherwood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- In the Matter of Trans-United Industries, Inc., Debtor. Rywelle Associates, Inc. v. Robert E. Cohn, Trustee, Textile Banking Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Singer Products Co. v. First American Bank of New York (In Re Singer Products Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.