Rope Co. v. . Aluminum Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
This is in action for a perpetual injunction to (573) restrain the defendant from proceeding to construct across the Yadkin River at the "Narrows" its dam to a certain height which the plaintiff claims would pond water back on its mill and lands, and for a mandatory injunction to remove the "Whitney" dam which the defendant owns at another point on said river.
This appeal is from the refusal of the judge to grant an injunction to the hearing.
The plaintiff alleges that it owns a tract of land on said river on which it has a cordage mill, and that immediately below said tract the defendant owns…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dorsey v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- City of Durham v. Eno Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Forter v. Armstrong.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Walton v. . MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- Berger v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Neuse River Foundation, Inc. v. Smithfield Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Doggett Lumber Co. v. ConradesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928