Hepburn v. Hey
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Linn,
This appeal is from an order striking off an entry of satisfaction of a judgment. It has been said that when a court orders the satisfaction of a judgment, “It not only annihilates the judgment, but it extinguishes both the evidence of a debt and the debt itself,” and that without statutory power to do so, a court may not order satisfaction summarily: Horner & McCann v. Hower, 39 Pa. 126, 128; Reynolds v. Barnes, 76 Pa. 427.
The judgment which is the subject of this appeal was entered June 9,1932, pursuant to a warrant accompanying a bond secured by mortgage. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Beaver County Building & Loan Ass'n v. WinowichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Menges v. DentlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
- Haverford Township School District v. HerzogSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Philadelphia v. Ridge Ave. Ry. Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1891
- Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives & Granting Annuities v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Disston EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Tradesmen's National Bank & Trust Co. v. FloydSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- In re Olyphant Borough CouncilmenLackawanna County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1943