Legal Opinion

Hepburn v. Hey

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1942No. Appeal, 94PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Linn,

This appeal is from an order striking off an entry of satisfaction of a judgment. It has been said that when a court orders the satisfaction of a judgment, “It not only annihilates the judgment, but it extinguishes both the evidence of a debt and the debt itself,” and that without statutory power to do so, a court may not order satisfaction summarily: Horner & McCann v. Hower, 39 Pa. 126, 128; Reynolds v. Barnes, 76 Pa. 427.

The judgment which is the subject of this appeal was entered June 9,1932, pursuant to a warrant accompanying a bond secured by mortgage. The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Beaver County Building & Loan Ass'n v. WinowichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Menges v. DentlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
  3. Haverford Township School District v. HerzogSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Philadelphia v. Ridge Ave. Ry. Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1891
  5. Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives & Granting Annuities v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Disston EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Tradesmen's National Bank & Trust Co. v. FloydSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. In re Olyphant Borough CouncilmenLackawanna County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API