Robert Dale Bernath v. Walter E. Craven, Warden, Folsom State Prison
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before DUNIWAY, INGRAHAM * and WALLACE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
This appeal from the district court’s refusal to grant petitioner’s writ of habeas corpus presents the issue whether our decision in Wright v. Craven, 461 F.2d 1109 (9th Cir. 1972), should be applied retroactively. In Wright, this court held that where a defendant’s admission of a prior felony conviction can be used to enhance his sentence, the admission is the functional equivalent of a plea of guilty, and is valid only if the defendant is aware of the consequences of his admission. Concluding that the rule enunciated…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Halliday v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- In Re YurkoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jack Messelt v. State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- John Julius Sesser v. J. B. GunnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Harmes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982