Highland Box Gold Min. Co. v. Pouch
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District •of Utah.
1Opinion of the Court
THAYER, Circuit Judge.
On October 25, 1901, Albert Pouch, the defendant in error, was in the employ of the Highland Boy Gold Mining Company, the plaintiff in error, as a machine man, his duty being to operate a drilling machine at such places within the defendant’s mine as he was directed to work. On the day last aforesaid he was ordered to take his drill to the eighth floor of “Eittle 2 Stope,” in the fifth level, and to work at that place. While he was at that point the stope caved in, and in his efforts to escape from the falling rock and timber he was severely injured. He sued the company…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Armour v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Finalyson v. Utica Mining & Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
3Cited by8 opinions
- Holland v. Durham Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- LaBee v. Sultan Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
- Lassasso v. Jones Bros.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1915
- Dasher v. Hooking Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- Miller v. Utah Consol. Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.