Legal Opinion

StarKist Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided November 18, 2020No. 14-00068Published

1Opinion of the Court

Slip Op. 20-164 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE STARKIST CO., Plaintiff, Before: Timothy M. Reif, Judge v. Court No. 14-00068 UNITED STATES, Defendant. OPINION [Denying plaintiff’s Rule 56 motion for summary judgment and granting defendant’s Rule 56 cross-motion for summary judgment.] Dated: November 18, 2020 Michael E. Roll and Brett Ian Harris, Roll & Harris LLP, for plaintiff. Alexander Vanderweide, Trial Attorney, Civil Division, Commercial Litigation Branch, U.S. Department of Justice, of Washington, D.C., for defendant United States. With him on the brief was Justin R.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. Dairyland Power Cooperative v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  3. Sports Graphics, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  4. North American Processing Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  5. Pillowtex Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API