Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Kinikini

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho

Decided September 20, 2019No. 19-06032Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF IDAHO IN RE: TENESITA M. KINIKINI and Case No. 19-00134-TLM MYLA LYNNETTE KINIKINI, Debtors. CRAIG CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. Adv. No. 19-06032-TLM TENESITA M. KINIKINI, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION In this adversary proceeding, Craig Cunningham (“Cunningham”) contends that chapter 7 debtor Tenesita Kinikini (“Kinikini”) willfully and maliciously injured him by making numerous telephone calls in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act,

47 U.S.C. § 227

(“TCPA”), and, therefore, Cunningham’s claim should be nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API