Legal Opinion

Fitterling v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1883PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from Johnson Circuit Court. — IIon. Noah M. G-ivan, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

Action for damages for killing mules in Centerview township, brought before a justice of the peace of ’Warrensburg township, which adjoins the township where the injury happened.

1

We have no doubt that the justice had jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action. Section 2835, Revised Statutes 1879, so far as pertinent to the present inquiry, is *505as follows: “ Except as otherwise provided by law, justices of the peace slxall have original jurisdiction of * * all actions against any railroad company in this State to recover damages for the killing or injuring of horses, mules, cattle or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clardy v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  2. Bothwell v. C., M. & St. P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  3. Reddick v. NewburnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  4. Case v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Clarke v. Ohio River R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Witting v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  3. Witting v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. KavanaughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  5. Barnett, Haynes & Barnett v. Colonial Hotel Building Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1909

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API